Forum Schwarzes Baden-Württemberg (http://forum.schwarzes-bw.de/wbb231/index.php)
- Kultur (http://forum.schwarzes-bw.de/wbb231/board.php?boardid=5)
-- Philosophie und Religion (http://forum.schwarzes-bw.de/wbb231/board.php?boardid=37)
--- Philosophentest (http://forum.schwarzes-bw.de/wbb231/thread.php?threadid=11044)


Geschrieben von Dr.House am 27.02.2007 um 13:05:

  Philosophentest

Wer wissen will mit welchem Philosophen er konform geht, vielleicht sogar ohne es zu wissen hat hier was zum spielen :

http://selectsmart.com/PRO/sel.html?id=8


Bei mir hats auf jeden Fall hingehauen:

Your Results:


1. Ayn Rand (100%) Click here for info
2. Epicureans (97%) Click here for info
3. Spinoza (90%) Click here for info

Viel Spaß lächelt



Geschrieben von [robson] am 27.02.2007 um 13:15:

 

Sehr schöner Test! Hätte mir das Ergebnis ähnlich vorgestellt, nur Madame Rand war mir bisher nicht bekannt *notier*

1. John Stuart Mill (100%)
2. Ayn Rand (96%)
3. Kant (94%)
4. Jean-Paul Sartre (89%)
5. Jeremy Bentham (86%)
6. Spinoza (83%)
7. Plato (82%)
8. Aquinas (80%)
9. Aristotle (78%)
10. Stoics (76%)



Geschrieben von Riverz End am 27.02.2007 um 14:01:

 

Sartre 100%.



Geschrieben von NineBerry am 27.02.2007 um 14:22:

 

1. MORAL STATEMENTS Moral statements are primarily:: c) statements of command (e.g. "Murder is wrong" means "I say: don't murder").
2. PURPOSE TO LIFE Does each person have a moral purpose/morally ideal way to live?: e) No, yet there are logically consistent ways to act and logically inconsistent ways to act
3. PROPER ORIGIN OF MORALITY Where does the proper distinction between "good" and "bad" come from?: b) Every individual, through their choice to pursue that which they desire.
4. SOCIETAL INFLUENCE Must a person be coerced/ influenced at some level by societal powers in order to live morally/virtuously?: c) Sort of, society doesn't have to coerce a person to find morality, but the interest/rights of others in society must conveyed to a person in order for that person to determine right from wrong.
5. VIRTUOUS LIFE To be virtuous/live morally, we should primarily make moral distinctions according to:: d) our empirical knowledge (what we know with experimentation).
6. HAPPINESS Will using morality properly necessarily result in maximization of our own happiness?: b) No, not necessarily.
7. UNIVERSAL LAW Should I act as if the maxim (principle) with which I act were to become the universal law for all rational people?: b) Yes, but in a very loose manner, evaluating the unique specifics of the situation is essential.
8. END, MEANS, INTENT Which is the most important, morally?: d) None of them are significantly more important than the others.
9. INDIVIDUAL & OTHERS Is the self-pleasure or self-preservation of the individual ever in conflict with the same type of interests of others?: c) Yes, and neither the interest of own self nor the interest of the other is more important.
10. LIBERTY Would it be ideal to maximize pleasure for all people even at the cost of liberty for some?: a) Yes
11. ASCETIC LIFE Is ascetic living (simple life with a minimum of physical comforts) conducive to being virtuous?: c) No, physical comforts are fine, they may even be rewarding
12. VIRTUOUS PERSON A virtuous person can be described best as:: f) Concerned with others, yet very rational

Rankings:

1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#sart
2. Jeremy Bentham (77%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#bent
3. John Stuart Mill (69%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#mill
4. Kant (67%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#kant



Geschrieben von Mulciber am 27.02.2007 um 17:05:

 

John Stuart Mill (100%)
Jean-Paul Sartre (97%)
Jeremy Bentham (97%)
Epicureans (88%)
Aquinas (84%)
Spinoza (82%)
Aristotle (81%)
David Hume (76%)
St. Augustine (71%)
Ayn Rand (71%)

Nur 97% Sartre, wie traurig.

Wobei ich sagen muss, der ganze Test ist eine Lüge, weil Camus nicht genannt wurde und ich bin sicherlich 111% Camus.
Zudem bin ich gar kein Maximaler Nutzen befürworter und Nietzsche ist nur bei 66% ..



Geschrieben von VelvetSilence am 14.03.2007 um 13:43:

 

Also interessanter Test, muss ich schon sagen.....
Hier mal mein Ergebnis:

1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%)
2. Spinoza (91%)
3. Nietzsche (89%)
4. Epicureans (82%)
5. Nel Noddings (81%)
6. Jeremy Bentham (73%)
7. David Hume (70%)
8. Thomas Hobbes (70%)
9. Prescriptivism (65%)
10. Kant (61%)
11. Aristotle (55%)
12. Aquinas (53%)
13. Stoics (52%)
14. John Stuart Mill (52%)
15. St. Augustine (34%)
16. Plato (31%)
17. Ockham (30%)
18. Ayn Rand (16%)
19. Cynics (4%)



Geschrieben von cRaShMaKeR am 14.03.2007 um 15:10:

 

1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%)
2. John Stuart Mill (98%)
3. Kant (94%)
4. Prescriptivism (89%)
5. Aquinas (72%)
6. Epicureans (68%)
7. Spinoza (68%)
8. Aristoteles (67%)
9. Jeremy Bentham (65%)
10. Plato (63%)
11. Ayn Rand (62%)
12. David Hume (60%)
13. Nietzsche (60%)


hmhm..

Wobei ich sagen muss, das ich mir stellenweise nicht 100% sicher bin, ob ich alles für mich korrekt übersetzt hab..

sonst kommt bei mir bei so tests immer Ghandi raus grosses Grinsen

€dit: Wobei ih sagen muss, Sartre sagt mir überhaupt nicht zu grosses Grinsen



Geschrieben von Chiropterus am 14.03.2007 um 21:02:

 

Ich habe mir erlaubt den Titel anzupassen. lächelt

Den Test habe ich auch gemacht aber die Resultate waren wirr und unpassend.



Geschrieben von angel am 19.05.2007 um 13:20:

 

Bei mir ist 100% Stoiker
99% Nietzsche

Genau das, was ich ohne Analyse auch von mir behauptet hätte freut sich



Geschrieben von Cele am 19.05.2007 um 14:20:

 

1. Ayn Rand (100%)
2. Jean-Paul Sartre (95%)
3. John Stuart Mill (89%)
4. Epicureans (75%)
5. Thomas Hobbes (69%)
6. Aristotle (68%)
7. Jeremy Bentham (67%)
8. Kant (65%)
9. Prescriptivism (63%)
10. Nietzsche (58%)
11. Ockham (53%)
12. Aquinas (51%)
13. David Hume (51%)
14. Cynics (44%)
15. Stoics (44%)
16. Spinoza (34%)
17. Nel Noddings (31%)
18. Plato (30%)
19. St. Augustine (26%)


Forensoftware: Burning Board 2.3.6, entwickelt von WoltLab GmbH