|
  |
 Philosophentest |
Dr.House 
Geheimer Meister
Dabei seit: 21.02.2007
 |
|
Wer wissen will mit welchem Philosophen er konform geht, vielleicht sogar ohne es zu wissen hat hier was zum spielen :
http://selectsmart.com/PRO/sel.html?id=8
Bei mir hats auf jeden Fall hingehauen:
Your Results:
1. Ayn Rand (100%) Click here for info
2. Epicureans (97%) Click here for info
3. Spinoza (90%) Click here for info
Viel Spaß 
__________________
Das Fleisch und die Sterne !
|
|
27.02.2007 13:05 |
|
|
|
|
Sehr schöner Test! Hätte mir das Ergebnis ähnlich vorgestellt, nur Madame Rand war mir bisher nicht bekannt *notier*
1. John Stuart Mill (100%)
2. Ayn Rand (96%)
3. Kant (94%)
4. Jean-Paul Sartre (89%)
5. Jeremy Bentham (86%)
6. Spinoza (83%)
7. Plato (82%)
8. Aquinas (80%)
9. Aristotle (78%)
10. Stoics (76%)
__________________
.
|
|
|
27.02.2007 13:15 |
![Fügen Sie [robson] in Ihre Kontaktliste ein](http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=132526682&img=5 "Fügen Sie [robson] in Ihre Kontaktliste ein")
|
|
NineBerry
Inquisitor-Meister
Dabei seit: 28.02.2005
|
|
1. MORAL STATEMENTS Moral statements are primarily:: c) statements of command (e.g. "Murder is wrong" means "I say: don't murder").
2. PURPOSE TO LIFE Does each person have a moral purpose/morally ideal way to live?: e) No, yet there are logically consistent ways to act and logically inconsistent ways to act
3. PROPER ORIGIN OF MORALITY Where does the proper distinction between "good" and "bad" come from?: b) Every individual, through their choice to pursue that which they desire.
4. SOCIETAL INFLUENCE Must a person be coerced/ influenced at some level by societal powers in order to live morally/virtuously?: c) Sort of, society doesn't have to coerce a person to find morality, but the interest/rights of others in society must conveyed to a person in order for that person to determine right from wrong.
5. VIRTUOUS LIFE To be virtuous/live morally, we should primarily make moral distinctions according to:: d) our empirical knowledge (what we know with experimentation).
6. HAPPINESS Will using morality properly necessarily result in maximization of our own happiness?: b) No, not necessarily.
7. UNIVERSAL LAW Should I act as if the maxim (principle) with which I act were to become the universal law for all rational people?: b) Yes, but in a very loose manner, evaluating the unique specifics of the situation is essential.
8. END, MEANS, INTENT Which is the most important, morally?: d) None of them are significantly more important than the others.
9. INDIVIDUAL & OTHERS Is the self-pleasure or self-preservation of the individual ever in conflict with the same type of interests of others?: c) Yes, and neither the interest of own self nor the interest of the other is more important.
10. LIBERTY Would it be ideal to maximize pleasure for all people even at the cost of liberty for some?: a) Yes
11. ASCETIC LIFE Is ascetic living (simple life with a minimum of physical comforts) conducive to being virtuous?: c) No, physical comforts are fine, they may even be rewarding
12. VIRTUOUS PERSON A virtuous person can be described best as:: f) Concerned with others, yet very rational
Rankings:
1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#sart
2. Jeremy Bentham (77%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#bent
3. John Stuart Mill (69%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#mill
4. Kant (67%) http://www.SelectSmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/description.html#kant
|
|
|
27.02.2007 14:22 |
|
|
Mulciber
The horror! The horror!
Dabei seit: 17.06.2006
|
|
John Stuart Mill (100%)
Jean-Paul Sartre (97%)
Jeremy Bentham (97%)
Epicureans (88%)
Aquinas (84%)
Spinoza (82%)
Aristotle (81%)
David Hume (76%)
St. Augustine (71%)
Ayn Rand (71%)
Nur 97% Sartre, wie traurig.
Wobei ich sagen muss, der ganze Test ist eine Lüge, weil Camus nicht genannt wurde und ich bin sicherlich 111% Camus.
Zudem bin ich gar kein Maximaler Nutzen befürworter und Nietzsche ist nur bei 66% ..
__________________
"Imaginarium des Intellektuellen: Abmagern ist der naive Akt des Intelligent-sein-Wollens."
(Roland Barthes)
|
|
|
27.02.2007 17:05 |
|
|
|
|
Also interessanter Test, muss ich schon sagen.....
Hier mal mein Ergebnis:
1. Jean-Paul Sartre (100%)
2. Spinoza (91%)
3. Nietzsche (89%)
4. Epicureans (82%)
5. Nel Noddings (81%)
6. Jeremy Bentham (73%)
7. David Hume (70%)
8. Thomas Hobbes (70%)
9. Prescriptivism (65%)
10. Kant (61%)
11. Aristotle (55%)
12. Aquinas (53%)
13. Stoics (52%)
14. John Stuart Mill (52%)
15. St. Augustine (34%)
16. Plato (31%)
17. Ockham (30%)
18. Ayn Rand (16%)
19. Cynics (4%)
__________________
Blut ist Leben.
Leben ist der Tod.
Tod ist Blut.
|
|
|
14.03.2007 13:43 |
|
|
|
|
Ich habe mir erlaubt den Titel anzupassen.
Den Test habe ich auch gemacht aber die Resultate waren wirr und unpassend.
|
|
|
14.03.2007 21:02 |
|
|
angel
Exkommunizierte Endzeitprophetin
Dabei seit: 11.03.2006
|
|
Bei mir ist 100% Stoiker
99% Nietzsche
Genau das, was ich ohne Analyse auch von mir behauptet hätte 
__________________
... And if I seem a little strange, well that's because I am
cya on Myspace!
|
|
|
19.05.2007 13:20 |
|
|
Cele
Geheime Meisterin
Dabei seit: 12.08.2006
|
|
1. Ayn Rand (100%)
2. Jean-Paul Sartre (95%)
3. John Stuart Mill (89%)
4. Epicureans (75%)
5. Thomas Hobbes (69%)
6. Aristotle (68%)
7. Jeremy Bentham (67%)
8. Kant (65%)
9. Prescriptivism (63%)
10. Nietzsche (58%)
11. Ockham (53%)
12. Aquinas (51%)
13. David Hume (51%)
14. Cynics (44%)
15. Stoics (44%)
16. Spinoza (34%)
17. Nel Noddings (31%)
18. Plato (30%)
19. St. Augustine (26%)
__________________
| Zitat: |
Ich sage euch: man muss noch Chaos in sich haben, um einen tanzenden Stern gebären zu können. Ich sage euch: ihr habt noch Chaos in euch
|
|
|
|
19.05.2007 14:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impressum
|
